On Tuesday 09 March 2004 17:49, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Ok, so the plan is to first move/copy the package and then perhaps > change it to reflect merlin's needs, right? I understand.
Right. > What do you think of deprecating the excalibur version. It's not > maintained anyway and gives the users a clear statement. util/i18n at the moment is not an API, as in "stable". Deprecation should not follow until the API is stable, and can be announced out as the replacement for the deprecation. > > Expect the same fate for excalibur-configuration. > Yes, I expected this :) > And plese also do this for excalibur-logger (my current favorite). excalibur-logger is a bit of 'too big' for me... IIUC, avalon/logging IS replacing excalibur-logger. So we would be talking about the official deprecation and all of that, right? Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
