On Tuesday 09 March 2004 18:39, Andreas Oberhack wrote: > I feel our difference is just a matter of definition. What I mean is:
perhaps. :o) > "one class with attached meta info == service". > "A service, handling one or many other objects == component". > > What do you think? This has been defined many times over in Avalon, and I think the current definition is; * Service; A contract of functionality, typically expressed as a java interface. * Component; One or many classes fulfilling one or many Service contracts. My concern is that these definitions and all other contractual statements are not rock-solid. Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
