> From: Leo Sutic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Simply put, there's no business case to be made for the migration > effort.
good point! > > An aside: Part of the reason I'm into this aspect-container > (whatever I'll end up calling it), is to provide this type > of scalability. You should be able to build an Avalon app > server, but also build something much smaller. Again a very good point! So my conclusion: 1. Let's define component contracts as "rock-solid" and stable as possible, having a bunch of testcases to ensure every aspect of those contracts. This is what our "customers" are requesting and what makes Avalon attractive to them and us. As less as possible migration needs in the long future! 2. Let's try to modularize the core as much as possible, so that it can be configured to different needs. This will broaden the user basis for Avalon and makes it "the container of choice" Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
