On Thursday 18 March 2004 22:55, Berin Loritsch wrote: > You know, that article that Bruce Eckel produced > (http://mindview.net/WebLog/log-0051) was thought provoking. Should > there be additional semantic meaning to an interface? I used to think > so, but now I don't. > > An interface is all you can enforce in code, and all you should expect > the user to respect. But that's just me.
1. I start thinking you are on drugs. :o) 2. As Jonathan points out, what is the method .remove() supposed to do? Start WarCraft and reformat the hard disk? 3. Service != interface -=-=> The Service carries with it a lot more than the Java interface, incl. the semantics, meta information, documentation, and preferably compliance tests. You can't call yourself a proponent of re-use... Especially since re-use is also a restriction, and you seem to take everything to the extreme edge, such restriction can't be good, so don't use it. Make your own bolts to fit your holes, will ya... Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
