> -----Original Message----- > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo Simons > > > or just saying that you'll stay out of the > > line of fire while the Avalon specification issue is resolved? > > I don't think I want to wait for "the Avalon specification issue to be > resolved". That sounds like something which takes several months, will > spur an (un)healthy flurry of controversy, etc. I'm saying that I'll > keep my mouth shut for a while to give people time to come up with > alternatives to the proposal we sent and discuss them. In other words, > Noel indicates there seems to be a "bigger issue" the avalon community > wants to solve before reaching a decision on our proposal, and I'll put > things "on hold" pending that. > > But if anyone opens fire, my monitor is not bulletproof ;)
I too would rather not wait for the specifications to come out before making a decision about your proposal. While I agree with Noel that the specs are an important issue which "MUST" be resolved sooner or later, I'd like to see resolution of this matter ASAP and I believe it can be made independently of the Avalon spec issue. In fact, I would say, let's just assume that sometime within the next year or so there will be an Avalon TCK. jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
