Andreas, > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Oberhack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi Alex, Nader, > > first of all: Thanks fort he excellent analysis Nader. You are really > giving a great outline what one could do!
+1 to that and we're glad to have your presence here. > > > > Ok you have me totally depressed and thinking this is near impossible > > now :-(. > > The question is, whether really want to do that all! Let's have a look > at the requirements first. You made very good points that I snipped out below. Occasionally I just need to stop and look at the big picture. Thanks for pressing pause and showing us the light. > So do we need distribution for scalability? I would say now! After your comments I would have to agree with you that fault tolerance is most critical. > My conclusion: we have to think about fault tolerance as the main issue. > That's it. Than let's switch to application side and solve business > semantics - that's the far more appealing part in the business > application arena! That's why Merlin rocks - a clear separation of > business logic and technical issues is possible by design! Very nicely put I'm no longer depressed :-). It is very feasible especially with Leo's last email to build in fault tolerance without bending over backwards. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
