On Wednesday 16 June 2004 01:45, Farr, Aaron wrote: > We'll also need to re-evaluate the role of the wiki in relation to the new > site, i.e.- what docs should be in the wiki, what should be on the site, > etc.
How about this thought? Wiki is a place where people dare to change spelling mistakes, but not content, and they dare to add new pages but barely touch existing ones, out of respect of the original author I think... This, IMHO, is a hindering factor. The original author throws in a couple of loose thoughts, loose his interest and noone touches it. How to overcome this?? I have no clue! But it is a symptom that makes our Wiki in a terrible shape compared to, for instance, Cocoon. Cheers Niclas -- +------//-------------------+ / http://www.bali.ac / / http://niclas.hedhman.org / +------//-------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
