On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:30:45 -0700, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leo and others are always advertising/promoting "baby steps" and many > of the vocal voices in this thread cherrish that basic concept, but > now want to make a big break, effectively a fork.
What I'm advocating is a clean break which would allow you to take those baby steps in any direction you want, since you don't have to worry as much where you put your feet. As for fork, well, any major change is in effect a fork. But consider it like this instead: You split Avalon framework into two forks: 4.x, which isn't going anywhere, and 5 which you can evolve as you see fit. They fulfill different needs. One could argue that it is 4 that is the fork, and 5 is the "head" one. "We forked it so it wouldn't change." Just as people still use Linux 2.4.x despite 2.6.x, and the 2.4.x kernels are still updated, while 2.6 clearly is the future. /LS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
