+1 On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 04:48, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > Paul needs no introduction. > > I don't know why he is no longer a committer, but apparently he must have > actively pushed for it at some point, instead of the more common approach and > just let the committership remain, but unused. > > I am calling for a vote to re-institutes his committer status! > > Here is my +1. > > > Cheers > Niclas
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]