+1

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 01:48, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Gang,
> Paul needs no introduction.
> 
> I don't know why he is no longer a committer, but apparently he must have 
> actively pushed for it at some point, instead of the more common approach and 
> just let the committership remain, but unused.
> 
> I am calling for a vote to re-institutes his committer status!
> 
> Here is my +1.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Niclas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to