Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 24 September 2004 03:28, Niclas Hedhman wrote:


Cast your vote on Stephen McConnell as committer.


+1, obviously.


-1

Stephen relinquished committership voluntarily, and until he expresses
a desire to be reintegrated into the group, we should not make him feel
as if his hand is forced in the matter.

We still need to see an Avalon *working* without Stephen doing a bunch
of free work for everyone.  The bottom line is that no matter how the
project is structured, if Avalon's fate is tied to one man--ANY one
man (be that you, me, Stephen, etc.)--then Avalon is essentially dead.
Once that person is gone, the project is catatonic.

I would really like to see the current crop of Avalon committers step
up to the plate collectively.  There has been a lot of silence lately,
and partly because of waiting to hear about the Metro resolution.

That's over, and its time to move forward.

--

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
- Rich Cook



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to