[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12997984#comment-12997984
]
Xiaolu Ye commented on AVRO-726:
--------------------------------
For us, making the fields protected is good enough.
Btw, I noticed the fix version is now 1.5.1 for this issue. Is it because of
the npe function I requested for GenericDatumWriter?
> Make GenericDatumReader/GenericDatumWriter data member protected so that it
> can be used by the derived classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-726
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-726
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0
> Reporter: Xiaolu Ye
> Assignee: Scott Carey
> Fix For: 1.5.1
>
> Attachments: AVRO-726.1.patch
>
>
> Currently, GenericDatumReader/GenericDatumWriter data members are private. Is
> it possible to make them protected so that we could extend those classes and
> create our own special DatumReader/Writer? The reason we want to do that is
> because we've created our own base SpecificRecordEx that implements
> SpecificRecord and added put/get for primitive types. We now want to extend
> the GenericDatumReader/GenericDatumWriter to use those primitive put/get
> functions to reduce box/unbox for better performance.
> Thanks,
> Xiaolu
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
