[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13638384#comment-13638384
]
Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-1299:
------------------------------------
I don't yet see how implementing set() in SpecificRecordBase now makes
implementing immutable records impossible in the future. If this is called on
an immutable record then it should throw an exception, but not on a mutable
record. What am I missing?
> SpecificRecordBase implements GenericRecord
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-1299
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1299
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java
> Affects Versions: 1.7.4
> Reporter: Christophe Taton
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.7.5
>
> Attachments: AVRO-1299.20130416-222225.patch,
> AVRO-1299.20130417-101039.patch, AVRO-1299.20130418-133947.patch
>
>
> Code written for generic records should be directly applicable on equivalent
> specific records.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
