[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1299?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13638491#comment-13638491
 ] 

Scott Carey commented on AVRO-1299:
-----------------------------------

I agree, 101039 seems best.  If we didn't already have IndexedRecord.put(), I 
might want to split the interfaces up now, but there is no reason to roll that 
in in this JIRA as is.

Thanks Christophe!


Note -- it will probably be slower to serialize a SpecificRecord via its 
GenericRecord interface, but probably only a little since there is quite a bit 
of overhead in both at the moment anyway.
                
> SpecificRecordBase implements GenericRecord
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-1299
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1299
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.4
>            Reporter: Christophe Taton
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.7.5
>
>         Attachments: AVRO-1299.20130416-222225.patch, 
> AVRO-1299.20130417-101039.patch, AVRO-1299.20130418-133947.patch
>
>
> Code written for generic records should be directly applicable on equivalent 
> specific records.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to