[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13737925#comment-13737925
]
Scott Carey commented on AVRO-1126:
-----------------------------------
We should definitely clean up the exposure of Jackson in our API. I propose
deprecating the use of it in the 1.8.x in favor of a replacement and remove it
in 1.9.x.
Upgrading to 2.x from 1.x is a different issue. I fail to see how upgrading to
2.2 is urgent at all. What new features do you propose that Avro needs to use
internally? If Avro no longer exposes Jackson in its API, it is a purely
internal matter to Avro and does not affect users who might want to use Jackson
2.x themselves, since Jackson 1.x and 2.x live in non-conflicting namespaces
both in maven and java package names.
> Upgrade to Jackson 2+
> ---------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-1126
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1126
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: java
> Reporter: James Tyrrell
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>
> Quite annoyingly with Jackson 2+ the base package name has changed from
> org.codehaus.jackson to com.fasterxml.jackson so in addition to changing the
> dependencies from:
> {code:xml}
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.jackson</groupId>
> <artifactId>jackson-core-asl</artifactId>
> <version>${jackson.version}</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.jackson</groupId>
> <artifactId>jackson-mapper-asl</artifactId>
> <version>${jackson.version}</version>
> </dependency>
> {code}
> to:
> {code:xml}
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
> <artifactId>jackson-core</artifactId>
> <version>${jackson.version}</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.core</groupId>
> <artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
> <version>${jackson.version}</version>
> </dependency>
> {code}
> the base package in the code needs to be updated. More info can be found
> [here|http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonUpgradeFrom19To20], I am happy to do
> the work just let me know what is preferable i.e. should I just attach a
> patch to this issue?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
