[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13891047#comment-13891047
 ] 

Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-1443:
------------------------------------

This patch has a lot of cosmetic changes, many in code that's otherwise not 
changed.  It removes end-of-line spaces, changes the order of imports, 
reformats code, adds redundant @inheritDoc tags, adds section-heading comments, 
etc.  These might all be fine changes, but they make it much more difficult for 
me to review the patch's functional changes, since I cannot focus on them.  I 
much prefer cosmetic changes as separate patches.  If an IDE is automatically 
making some of these changes for you then I encourage you to reconfigure the 
IDE.

It appears that this change is incompatible since it will require 
re-compilation rather than simply a jar update.  Is that right?  If so, then we 
should include it in 1.8.0, not 1.7.7.

> SpecificRecord builders should share more functionality with GenericRecord 
> builders
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-1443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1443
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.5, 1.7.6
>            Reporter: Christophe Taton
>            Assignee: Christophe Taton
>         Attachments: AVRO-1443.20140126-182111-0800.diff, 
> AVRO-1443.20140202-182611-0800.svndiff
>
>
> Ideally, wherever a generic record builder is expected, one should be able to 
> supply a builder for a specific record.
> That could happen by making SpecificRecordBuilderBase (and 
> SpecificErrorBuilderBase?) a subclass of GenericRecordBuilder.
> Since SpecificRecordBase implements GenericRecord, it should be possible with 
> minimal effort.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to