+1 On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid> wrote:
> +! > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could > start > > making use of pull requests. > > > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar > > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable > > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be > needed[2]. I > > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to call > it > > out here. > > > > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a link > > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back > in > > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for > > [DISCUSS] threads. > > > > Please vote: > > > > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging > > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because... > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority > > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s). > > > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0 > > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the > > account linking utility: > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ > > > > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it > will > > need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call this > > out in our contribution docs. > > > > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Software Engineer > Netflix >
