+1 On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > On 2017-08-29 11:29, "Sean Busbey"<bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could > start making use of pull requests. > > > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar > to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable > repository will be on github and some committer set up will be needed[2]. I > don't think this got adequately conveyed originally, so I wanted to call it > out here. > > > > Additionally, the infra process for converting to gitbox requires a link > to a community consensus thread. While I think we already had that back in > [1], May was a long time ago and some folks might not be watching for > [DISCUSS] threads. > > > > Please vote: > > > > +1: we should convert to gitbox and enable pull request merging > > -1: we should not convert to gitbox because... > > > > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours and will be subject to Majority > Approval (3 or more +1s and more +1s than -1s). > > > > [1]: https://s.apache.org/ieB0 > > [2]: Committers will need to flag a github account as theirs via the > account linking utility: > > https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ > > > > The git-wip repository will also cease, so folks who currently use it > will need to update their remote url for existing git clones. We can call > this out in our contribution docs. > > >
