unless the RM has an objection based on where they are in the RC creation process, I say go for it. (and if there is such an issue then let's get it ready for 1.9.3)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:29 AM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote: > > Hello! There's a long standing PR[1][2] that provides an impressive > performance boost to deserializing Avro. > > The author has been patient and reactive for a LONG time (thanks Martin!), > and it's inspired some really interesting discussion. > > I'd like to merge and cherry-pick into release 1.9.2 -- as long as it's > turned off there shouldn't be any visible effect at all, and having it in a > release would be a great way to find regressions (if any) and encourage > some of the ideas brought up in the PR discussions. > > Any objections? Is this too big a change for a minor release? > > I noted in the PR that it would be pretty cool if we had a "better" way of > noting experimental features (and that the Yetus annotations would be a > good start for 1.10!) > > All my best, Ryan > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2247 > [2]: https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/391
