Hi Mchael,
Thank you for bringing this up. I agree, but I'm not sure how we're going
to migrate the users to the avro package.
Rijprojectnum_downloads
1
avro
885838
2
avro-python3
147313
A quick query on bigquery, that contains all the pypi downloads shows that
the python3 package is more popular. Maybe we should add a deprecation
warning in 1.10.0?
Cheers,
Fokko
The query:
SELECT file.project, COUNT(*) AS num_downloads
FROM `the-psf.pypi.downloads*`
WHERE file.project IN ('avro-python3', 'avro')
-- Only query the last 30 days of history
AND _TABLE_SUFFIX
BETWEEN FORMAT_DATE(
'%Y%m%d', DATE_SUB(CURRENT_DATE(), INTERVAL 30 DAY))
AND FORMAT_DATE('%Y%m%d', CURRENT_DATE())
GROUP BY file.project
Op do 30 apr. 2020 om 14:20 schreef Michael Smith <[email protected]>:
> Previous emails on this list have discussed the "why" questions. But when
> and how should we go about it? Could 1.10 be the last avro release to
> include avro-python3? This would allow us to play a little less ticket
> tennis with folks reporting bugs (can you reproduce this in "the other"
> python library?) and focus all our effort into one python implementation.
>
> What do you think?
>
