Hi Mchael, Thank you for bringing this up. I agree, but I'm not sure how we're going to migrate the users to the avro package.
Rijprojectnum_downloads 1 avro 885838 2 avro-python3 147313 A quick query on bigquery, that contains all the pypi downloads shows that the python3 package is more popular. Maybe we should add a deprecation warning in 1.10.0? Cheers, Fokko The query: SELECT file.project, COUNT(*) AS num_downloads FROM `the-psf.pypi.downloads*` WHERE file.project IN ('avro-python3', 'avro') -- Only query the last 30 days of history AND _TABLE_SUFFIX BETWEEN FORMAT_DATE( '%Y%m%d', DATE_SUB(CURRENT_DATE(), INTERVAL 30 DAY)) AND FORMAT_DATE('%Y%m%d', CURRENT_DATE()) GROUP BY file.project Op do 30 apr. 2020 om 14:20 schreef Michael Smith <mich...@smith-li.com>: > Previous emails on this list have discussed the "why" questions. But when > and how should we go about it? Could 1.10 be the last avro release to > include avro-python3? This would allow us to play a little less ticket > tennis with folks reporting bugs (can you reproduce this in "the other" > python library?) and focus all our effort into one python implementation. > > What do you think? >