For the releases, the information is on Github: https://github.com/apache/avro/releases. For the fine details, Jira is the way to go. You can select which tickets are merged in which version. This is also how we generate the changelog, we condense it and put it on Github. Maybe we should add a link from the docs website to Github.
There is some traction around .Net, Ruby, Python, and especially Java. However, implementation such as Perl, C(++) is not happening a lot. Also, the original contributors aren't that active anymore. I like the idea of splitting the different languages to different repositories. For Parquet, the each repository contains also one language. This is also what Ryan suggested in the other thread. For more fundamental changes, there is this concept of Avro Enhancement Proposals: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AVRO/Avro+Enhancement+Proposals This is a confluence section where you can create a proposal, to get consensus in the community, and then implement it. Hope this helps! Cheers, Fokko Op di 5 mei 2020 om 10:56 schreef Andy Le <anhl...@gmail.com>: > I've checked Avro release notes [1] and found them containing vague > information about each release. There's also a lack of documentation for > other programming languages. > > My question: should we carefully lay out what to do, opening dedicated > issues to call for contributions? > > Thanks & best regards. > > [1] > https://avro.apache.org/releases.html#12+February+2020%3A+Avro+1.9.2+Released > > On 2020/05/03 07:07:46, Andy Le <anhl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm starting this thread to discuss about my issue about our community: > > > > > Recently I've seen so many Jira issues and Github PRs having no proper > responses from committers. > > > > I think responsive answers from members will create a better Avro > community. > > > > How can we resolve the issue? Glad that I can help any thing. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > >