Other alternative (probably the cleanest is to let dev@ only for discussion and issues for all the JIRA/github action. The tradeoff there is that people subscribed to dev@ only may miss part of the action (+ it is not backwards compatible with our archives) but it is clearly an option too.
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:47 PM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote: > > The issues in the yaml file are every comment done on every issue or > pull requests on github (notice that the issues part probably won't > apply to us since we use JIRA to track issues). > > Currently we receive ALL JIRA notifications into dev@ we can change > that us well since it probably makes sense.,However this is a > different process of the .asf.yaml file. > > The proposed notification schema will still notify new PRs and closed > PRs into dev@ which is valuable for awareness on new contributions, > maybe we can do that for JIRA too, just notify on created and closed > JIRAs (assuming INFRA can map such rule). then people interested in > tracking the middle steps and issue/PR discussions could go and > subscribe into issues@ where all the detailed information will be. > > Other opinions? Suggestions? > > > So many options > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:18 PM Ryan Skraba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This sounds good to me! The "issues" in the yaml are the GitHub > > issues, which are disabled in github right? > > > > Any opinions on moving JIRA notifications from [email protected] to > > issues@ as well? That's what I would expect! > > > > I guess this would make little difference to me in practice since I > > would subscribe to both, but it would make it a lot easier to browse > > and link to the dev@ mailing list on the web! > > > > All my best, Ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:15 AM Andy Le <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ismaël, > > > > > > Yep, I think it's a little bit noisy for our mailing list with such > > > notifications. But it's fun to see what other people are working on. > > > > > > IMHO, in addition to a new mailing list, we should have a better label > > > mechanism for easily routing/filtering messages. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > On 2020/05/05 22:59:59, Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Some of you have probably noticed that we are receiving a LOT of extra > > > > notifications that were not active in the past. This is happening > > > > because > > > > Apache INFRA installed a new way to map notifications into mailing > > > > lists for its > > > > projects and the default configuration right now is sending all the > > > > github > > > > notifications to dev@ > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/schemes.cgi?avro > > > > > > > > So I would like to propose that we create a new mailing list called > > > > maybe > > > > [email protected] To send all the git individual PR > > > > comments/reviews there > > > > and only the new/close PRs here. > > > > > > > > I suppose that issues@ could be a list of interest for some people and > > > > it will > > > > help us have a more readable dev@ mailing list. > > > > > > > > Technically all we need to do is create the new ML on selfserve and a > > > > new > > > > .asf.yaml file following this format. > > > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/asfyaml-notify > > > > > > > > WDYT? Other preferences or other name for the mailing list github@ > > > > maybe? > > > > More configuration ideas? > > > > > > > > You can see a WIP of the proposed changes here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/873 > > > >
