Yes, I'd be in favor of having a separate ML. If you want to keep track of
the action at the repository, you can also get notified using Github.

Cheers, Fokko

Op do 7 mei 2020 om 14:37 schreef Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com>:

> Let's wait for others opinions and if we agree I will proceed to
> create the ML next week.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 12:13 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think it's safe to create issues@ and merge the PR right away -- it
> > would pretty much restore the behaviour the dev@ list had at the
> > beginning of the year.
> >
> > I have all my mailing lists dumped into the same folder, but if
> > issues@ existed for JIRA and Github notifications, I would be tempted
> > to subscribe to the daily digest instead.
> >
> > I'm curious about how other highly-productive Apache developers have
> > their email filters set up for various projects!  It's easy to get
> > overwhelmed by the volume (especially if you don't keep up daily, I
> > was off most of March/April).
> >
> > In any case, https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/873 LGTM!
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:51 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Other alternative (probably the cleanest is to let dev@ only for
> > > discussion and issues for all the JIRA/github action. The tradeoff
> > > there is that people subscribed to dev@ only may miss part of the
> > > action (+ it is not backwards compatible with our archives) but it is
> > > clearly an option too.
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:47 PM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The issues in the yaml file are every comment done on every issue or
> > > > pull requests on github (notice that the issues part probably won't
> > > > apply to us since we use JIRA to track issues).
> > > >
> > > > Currently we receive ALL JIRA notifications into dev@ we can change
> > > > that us well since it probably makes sense.,However this is a
> > > > different process of the .asf.yaml file.
> > > >
> > > > The proposed notification schema will still notify new PRs and closed
> > > > PRs into dev@ which is valuable for awareness on new contributions,
> > > > maybe we can do that for JIRA too, just notify on created and closed
> > > > JIRAs (assuming INFRA can map such rule). then people interested in
> > > > tracking the middle steps and issue/PR discussions could go and
> > > > subscribe into issues@ where all the detailed information will be.
> > > >
> > > > Other opinions? Suggestions?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So many options
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:18 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This sounds good to me!  The "issues" in the yaml are the GitHub
> > > > > issues, which are disabled in github right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any opinions on moving JIRA notifications from j...@apache.org to
> > > > > issues@ as well?  That's what I would expect!
> > > > >
> > > > > I guess this would make little difference to me in practice since I
> > > > > would subscribe to both, but it would make it a lot easier to
> browse
> > > > > and link to the dev@ mailing list on the web!
> > > > >
> > > > > All my best, Ryan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 1:15 AM Andy Le <anhl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ismaël,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yep, I think it's a little bit noisy for our mailing list with
> such notifications. But it's fun to see what other people are working on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IMHO, in addition to a new mailing list, we should have a better
> label mechanism for easily routing/filtering messages.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2020/05/05 22:59:59, Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Some of you have probably noticed that we are receiving a LOT
> of extra
> > > > > > > notifications that were not active in the past.  This is
> happening because
> > > > > > > Apache INFRA installed a new way to map notifications into
> mailing lists for its
> > > > > > > projects and the default configuration right now is sending
> all the github
> > > > > > > notifications to dev@
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/schemes.cgi?avro
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I would like to propose that we create a new mailing list
> called maybe
> > > > > > > iss...@avro.apache.org To send all the git individual PR
> comments/reviews there
> > > > > > > and only the new/close PRs here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I suppose that issues@ could be a list of interest for some
> people and it will
> > > > > > > help us have a more readable dev@ mailing list.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Technically all we need to do is create the new ML on
> selfserve and a new
> > > > > > > .asf.yaml file following this format.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://s.apache.org/asfyaml-notify
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > WDYT? Other preferences or other name for the mailing list
> github@ maybe?
> > > > > > > More configuration ideas?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can see a WIP of the proposed changes here:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/873
> > > > > > >
>

Reply via email to