I merged this -- but it's not written in stone!  Please feel free to
bring up any improvements in any of our processes, of course!

Ryan

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 6:17 PM Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you Ryan! This version looks much more friendly.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Oscar
>
> --
> Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <[email protected]>
>
> Op do 1 sep. 2022 22:48 schreef Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 for the improvements!
> >
> > I hope that less people will ignore it now after explicitly stating that if
> > the template is ignored then the review will be postponed :-)
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 10:04 PM Ryan Skraba <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey everybody --
> > >
> > > For the most part, it seems that the PR template that we use is
> > > largely ignored, and the checklist is seldom actually applied!  Github
> > > reports on the number of tasks done in the checklist, but most merged
> > > PRs don't have 4 tasks out of 4 completed.  It's kind of misleading.
> > >
> > > I think we can probably do better and have more descriptive PRs with
> > > less general boilerplate to encourage more targeted text!
> > >
> > > I put up a proposal shamelessly adapted from Flink at
> > > https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/1851, all comments are welcome!
> > >
> > > All my best, Ryan
> > >
> >

Reply via email to