Sounds good.

Looking forward to the next RC.

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Christian R Kadner <ckad...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
> we decided to ignore the test that failed sporadically when we tested the
> RC in December (BAHIR-83).
>
> So we should be good to give it a second attempt.
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Kadner
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Ted Yu ---01/10/2017 08:58:06 AM---Is it
> a proper time to start preparing the next RC ? Cheers]Ted Yu
> ---01/10/2017 08:58:06 AM---Is it a proper time to start preparing the next
> RC ? Cheers
>
> From: Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@bahir.apache.org
> Date: 01/10/2017 08:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Is it a proper time to start preparing the next RC ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> > Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
> >
> > The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
>
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> > (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/bahi
> > r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
> >
> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
> >
> > The source distribution is also available at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to