+1

I'm on the road for two weeks so I can't do any testing but I did test
0.4.0-incubating so I'm forwarding my vote to this (essentially) renamed
release.

On Fri, Dec 30, 2016, 09:04 Davor Bonaci <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> A passing set of Jenkins suites:
> * https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PreCommit_Java_MavenInstall/6336/
> * https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_MavenInstall/2245/
> *
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_RunnableOnService_Apex/138/
> *
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_RunnableOnService_Flink/1256/
> *
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_RunnableOnService_Spark/575/
> *
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/beam_PostCommit_Java_RunnableOnService_Dataflow/1928/
>
> Davor
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Dan Halperin <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > * mvn verify passes with and without network enabled
> > * mvn apache-ret:check passes
> > * mvn verify passes with -Prelease
> > * release signature properly signed by JB (using the KEYS file as the
> > keyring)
> > * No binary files [one false positive empty file
> > in ./runners/core-java/src/test/java/.placeholder we should plausibly
> > delete in future]
> >     (osx: find . -type f -exec file -I '{}' \; | grep 'charset=binary')
> >
> > * Module changes are as expected (microbenchmarks had a licensing issue
> and
> > was removed). Licensing for dependencies of new modules is okay (all
> > Apache).
> >
> >    new:
> >    > apache-beam/runners/apex/pom.xml
> >    > apache-beam/sdks/java/extensions/sorter/pom.xml
> >    > apache-beam/sdks/java/maven-archetypes/examples-java8/pom.xml
> >    >
> > apache-beam/sdks/java/maven-archetypes/examples-java8/src/ma
> > in/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml
> >
> >    removed:
> >    < apache-beam/sdks/java/microbenchmarks/pom.xml
> >
> > * No occurrences of the substring `incub` in the source zip.
> >
> > * Ran all additional postcommits in Jenkins against the release tag, and
> > all passed.
> >
> > So, looks good to me!
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Minor fix & update: the source code tag is obviously v0.4.0-RC1
> > >
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=beam.git;a=tag;h=r
> > > efs/tags/v0.4.0-RC1
> > >
> > > I launched Jenkins on the tag and it passed:
> > >
> > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Beam/job/beam_PostCommit_Java
> > > _MavenInstall/2245/
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/29/2016 08:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
> > >> 0.4.0, as follows:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >>
> > >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> > >> * JIRA release notes [1],
> > >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org
> > >> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
> > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
> > >> * source code tag "v1.2.3-RC3" [5],
> > >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the API
> > >> reference manual [6].
> > >>
> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> > >> approval, with at least 3 PPMC affirmative votes.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> > >> ctId=12319527&version=12338590
> > >>
> > >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/0.4.0/
> > >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
> > >> [4] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > >> beam-1009/
> > >> [5]
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=beam.git;a=tag;h=a
> > >> b73a243ccfdae18f81435bfcf9de21c195fef4d
> > >>
> > >> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/117
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to