@dan are you saying that mvn verify isn't doing checkstyle anymore? Some of
the checkstyles are still running for a few modules. Also, the contribution
docs will need to change. They say to run mvn verify before commits.

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:25 AM Dan Halperin <dhalp...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Several folks seem to have been confused after BEAM-246, where we moved the
> "slow things" into the release profile. I've started a discussion with
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1740 to see if there are things we can
> do to fill these gaps.
>
> Would love folks to chime in with opinions.
>
> Dan
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jesse Anderson <je...@smokinghand.com>
> wrote:
>
> > @Eugene, yes that failed on the checkstyle.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:27 PM Eugene Kirpichov
> > <kirpic...@google.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Try just -Prelease.
> > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:21 PM Jesse Anderson <je...@smokinghand.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fails because I don't have a secret key.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:03 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jesse,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you try the same with:
> > > > >
> > > > > mvn verify -Prelease,apache-release
> > > > >
> > > > > ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > JB
> > > > >
> > > > > On 01/04/2017 09:53 PM, Jesse Anderson wrote:
> > > > > > For some reason, running "mvn verify" isn't running checkstyle on
> > > > > > everything. I had checkstyle errors in beam-sdks-java-core that
> > > weren't
> > > > > > being found.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I thought this was due to the extra parameters. I reran with the
> > > plain
> > > > > "mvn
> > > > > > verify" and it still didn't find them. From the output, it
> doesn't
> > > look
> > > > > > like they're being run at all.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jesse
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > > > > jbono...@apache.org
> > > > > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > > > > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to