I think the confusion to new users is much worse than any temporary loss of functionality here. +1 * 100!
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Mingmin Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > Have ignored TravisCI for some time as the failures are not related with > code/test issues. > > I still hope TravisCI could work with Beam code repository some day, to > run tests before creating a PR. > > Mingmin > > > On Apr 28, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Big +1 > > > >> On 29. Apr 2017, at 07:21, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Travis is useless and our Jenkins is good IMHO ! > >> > >> Travis is really useful for the Python SDK, but I'm hopeful that soon > >> Jenkins will be stable and quick enough that I won't miss it, and > >> having only one CI to deal with should simplify things. > >> > >> - Robert > > >
