Big +1 also,

I've been ignoring Travis for some months also.

I totally agree with what Dan wrote.

Best

Etienne


Le 30/04/2017 à 19:19, Dan Halperin a écrit :
I think the confusion to new users is much worse than any temporary loss of
functionality here. +1 * 100!

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Mingmin Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

+1
Have ignored TravisCI for some time as the failures are not related with
code/test issues.

I still hope TravisCI could work with Beam code repository some day, to
run tests before creating a PR.

Mingmin

On Apr 28, 2017, at 10:26 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <[email protected]>
wrote:
Big +1

On 29. Apr 2017, at 07:21, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
wrote:
+1

Travis is useless and our Jenkins is good IMHO !
Travis is really useful for the Python SDK, but I'm hopeful that soon
Jenkins will be stable and quick enough that I won't miss it, and
having only one CI to deal with should simplify things.

- Robert

Reply via email to