I don't understand as all jars are on the Nexus staging repository.
The zip are also on staging repository.

Regards
JB

On Jul 19, 2017, 18:47, at 18:47, Aviem Zur <aviem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>@JB
>
>Hi, yes I saw that link, however those appear to be just the sources,
>not
>jars.
>Do we have built RC jars us to validate which are then deployed as is
>to
>dist (renamed to remove -RC and so forth) or do we each compile these
>manually and are assured that the sources in the dist are the actual
>ones
>that the final jars will be built from?
>
>On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:16 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>> Yes, +1 on RC2.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Aviem,
>> >
>> > as mentioned in the first e-mail:
>> >
>> > - Distributions are available here:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/
>> >
>> > - Artifacts are on the staging repository:
>> >
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1019/
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > JB
>> >
>> >
>> > On 07/19/2017 12:26 PM, Aviem Zur wrote:
>> >
>> >> Have the jars for RC2 been uploaded somewhere?
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
><j...@nanthrax.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So, I guess you are voting +1 on RC2, correct (just for the
>tracking) ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> JB
>> >>>
>> >>> On 07/19/2017 08:00 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Thank you JB.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I validated python wordcount and mobile gaming examples on
>Linux.
>> Found
>> >>>>
>> >>> one
>> >>>
>> >>>> issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2636). This
>does
>> not
>> >>>>
>> >>> need
>> >>>
>> >>>> to be a blocking issue for RC2, but if we end up having a RC3 we
>> should
>> >>>> consider fixing this issue.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ahmet
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Mingmin Xu <mingm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks Kenn. SQL DSL should be ready in the next version 2.2.0,
>and
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> agree
>> >>>
>> >>>> to have an overall row "Add SQL DSL" instead of listing all the
>> detailed
>> >>>>> tasks.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Kenneth Knowles
>> >>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Done.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Since it is all on a feature branch and the release notes when
>it
>> goes
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> to
>> >>>
>> >>>> master will include "Add SQL DSL" I did not associate the little
>bits
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> with
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> a release.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Mingmin Xu
><mingm...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> The tasks of SQL should not be labeled as 2.1.0, I've updated
>some
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> with
>> >>>
>> >>>> 2.2.0, fail to change the 'closed' ones. Can anyone with the
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> permission
>> >>>
>> >>>> update these tasks
>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2171?jql=
>> >>>>>>> project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0%
>> >>>>>>> 20AND%20component%20%3D%20dsl-sql?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>>>> Mingmin
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Yeah, indeed, the issue like BEAM-2171 should not have "Fix
>> Version"
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> set
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> to 2.1.0.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>>> JB
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 07/18/2017 06:52 PM, James wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Just noticed that some of the DSL_SQL issues are included in
>this
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> release?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> e.g. The first one: BEAM-2171, this is not expected,right?
>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 12:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
>> version
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> 2.1.0,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> as
>> >>>>>>>>>> follows:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>specific
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> comments)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>which
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> includes:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>> >>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [2],
>> >>>>>>>>>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76
>[3],
>> >>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>Repository
>> >>>>>>>>>> [4],
>> >>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.1.0-RC2" [5],
>> >>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing
>the
>> API
>> >>>>>>>>>> reference
>> >>>>>>>>>> manual [6].
>> >>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>release to
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
>by
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> majority
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> approval,
>> >>>>>>>>>> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>> JB
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>> >>>>>>>>>> ctId=12319527&version=12340528
>> >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/
>> >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>> >>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> >>>>>>>>>> beam-1019/
>> >>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.1.0-RC2
>> >>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/270
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>> >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> ----
>> >>>>>>> Mingmin
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> ----
>> >>>>> Mingmin
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> >>> jbono...@apache.org
>> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> > --
>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> > jbono...@apache.org
>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> >
>>

Reply via email to