+ 0.8

I tried running "mvn package” on my machine build it fails. This is the log 
output: https://gist.github.com/aljoscha/dc194303bede8bc635e2d8b691bb58f8 
<https://gist.github.com/aljoscha/dc194303bede8bc635e2d8b691bb58f8>. It fails 
when trying to build the Python part. Unfortunately I know almost nothing about 
this but one thing that caught my attention was this snipped "RuntimeError: Not 
in apache git tree; unable to find proto definitions.”. Could this be a problem?

Otherwise I’d say the RC is good and I did this:

 - verified the checksums and signature
 - checked that LICENSE and NOTICE are present
 - used the staged artefacts to create a Quickstart project
 - checked that the compiled Quickstart works with a Flink 1.2.1 cluster in 
batch and streaming mode

> On 19. Jul 2017, at 19:48, Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
> 
> +1 to the RC
> 
> Relating to Aviem's question, I think we need a release verification guide,
> at the least as a section of the Release Guide. But if we follow through on
> the prior thread of having a validation matrix with manual steps people
> sign up for, that is even better, and saves repeated work.
> 
> As notes towards this, below this email I have included the steps to go
> through the Java quickstart with the RC on DirectRunner and DataflowRunner,
> which I have done. It should be also easy for other runners.
> 
> I think the full ValidatesRunner suite run against the release-2.1.0 branch
> is adequate rather than trying to run them all against the RC, since we are
> not trying (necessarily) to testing the release plugin. I wouldn't _oppose_
> an easy way to run the full suite... (maybe just a fancy command line?)
> 
> Kenn
> 
> 
> <settings>
>  <activeProfiles>
>    <activeProfile>beam-2.1.0</activeProfile>
>  </activeProfiles>
>  <profiles>
>    <profile>
>      <id>beam-2.1.0</id>
>      <repositories>
>        <repository>
>          <id>beam-2.1.0</id>
>          <url>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1019/</url>
>        </repository>
>        <repository>
>          <id>archetype</id>
>          <url>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1019/</url>
>        </repository>
>      </repositories>
>    </profile>
>  </profiles>
> </settings>
> 
> mvn archetype:generate \
>      --settings settings.xml \
>      -P beam-2.1.0 \
>      -D archetypeGroupId=org.apache.beam \
>      -D archetypeArtifactId=beam-sdks-java-maven-archetypes-examples \
>      -D archetypeVersion=2.1.0 \
>      -D groupId=org.example \
>      -D artifactId=wordcountbeam \
>      -D version="0.1" \
>      -D package=org.apache.beam.examples \
>      -D interactiveMode=false
> 
> cd wordcountbeam
> 
> mvn compile exec:java \
>    --settings ../settings.xml \
>    -Pdirect-runner \
>    -D exec.mainClass=org.apache.beam.examples.WordCount \
>    -D exec.args="--inputFile=pom.xml --output=counts"
> 
> 
> mvn compile exec:java \
>    --settings ../settings.xml \
>    -P dataflow-runner \
>    -D exec.mainClass=org.apache.beam.examples.WordCount \
>    -D exec.args="--runner=DataflowRunner --project=<your-gcp-project>
> --gcpTempLocation=gs://<your-gcs-bucket>/tmp
> --inputFile=gs://apache-beam-samples/shakespeare/*
> --output=gs://<your-gcs-bucket>/counts"
> 
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> 
>> I don't understand as all jars are on the Nexus staging repository.
>> The zip are also on staging repository.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>> On Jul 19, 2017, 18:47, at 18:47, Aviem Zur <aviem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> @JB
>>> 
>>> Hi, yes I saw that link, however those appear to be just the sources,
>>> not
>>> jars.
>>> Do we have built RC jars us to validate which are then deployed as is
>>> to
>>> dist (renamed to remove -RC and so forth) or do we each compile these
>>> manually and are assured that the sources in the dist are the actual
>>> ones
>>> that the final jars will be built from?
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:16 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, +1 on RC2.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Aviem,
>>>>> 
>>>>> as mentioned in the first e-mail:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Distributions are available here:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Artifacts are on the staging repository:
>>>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1019/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 07/19/2017 12:26 PM, Aviem Zur wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Have the jars for RC2 been uploaded somewhere?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:19 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> <j...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, I guess you are voting +1 on RC2, correct (just for the
>>> tracking) ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 07/19/2017 08:00 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thank you JB.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I validated python wordcount and mobile gaming examples on
>>> Linux.
>>>> Found
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2636). This
>>> does
>>>> not
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> to be a blocking issue for RC2, but if we end up having a RC3 we
>>>> should
>>>>>>>> consider fixing this issue.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ahmet
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Mingmin Xu <mingm...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks Kenn. SQL DSL should be ready in the next version 2.2.0,
>>> and
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> agree
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> to have an overall row "Add SQL DSL" instead of listing all the
>>>> detailed
>>>>>>>>> tasks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Kenneth Knowles
>>>>>>>>> <k...@google.com.invalid
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Since it is all on a feature branch and the release notes when
>>> it
>>>> goes
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> master will include "Add SQL DSL" I did not associate the little
>>> bits
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> a release.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Mingmin Xu
>>> <mingm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> The tasks of SQL should not be labeled as 2.1.0, I've updated
>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2.2.0, fail to change the 'closed' ones. Can anyone with the
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> permission
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> update these tasks
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2171?jql=
>>>>>>>>>>> project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0%
>>>>>>>>>>> 20AND%20component%20%3D%20dsl-sql?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, indeed, the issue like BEAM-2171 should not have "Fix
>>>> Version"
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.1.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/18/2017 06:52 PM, James wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just noticed that some of the DSL_SQL issues are included in
>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g. The first one: BEAM-2171, this is not expected,right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 12:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.1.0,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>> specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> [2],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76
>>> [3],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>> Repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.1.0-RC2" [5],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing
>>> the
>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manual [6].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>>> release to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> majority
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> approval,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12319527&version=12340528
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.1.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> beam-1019/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.1.0-RC2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/270
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>>>> Mingmin
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>> Mingmin
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to