On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> I am also in favor of pinning as an immediate fix, bumping the bound
>> otherwise.
>>
>> Regarding putting an upper bound to avoid being broken, the last two
>> breaks have been due to just having an (unneeded) upper bound (which
>> held us back to broken/incompatible releases in relationship to other
>> dependencies). We should try to trust semantic versioning when
>> possible, and when not we must regularly audit.
>
> +1 to this, especially the auditing part. We also had breaks because we
> trusted semantic versioning. So far our semi-official policy was to trust a
> package until they prove it otherwise. I will argue that grpc here is making
> a breaking change in a minor version increment by changing the way they are
> depending on a major package.

A minor version bump should be allowed to require a minor version bump
in its dependencies.

> We have done a good job of auditing and updating those pinned (or upper
> bounded) dependencies, and probably we are behind in some of those.
>
> I wonder if we can automate some of this? If we can get a report, that
> audits our dependencies, warns us about new releases and potential conflicts
> it would be much easier to keep things up to date.

Big +1, it should be easy to set up a nightly that relaxes some of the
requirements and sees what (if anything) breaks. Not breaking is
likely a signal that we should relax ours.

>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Chamikara Jayalath (JIRA)
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >     [
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16293276#comment-16293276
>> > ]
>> >
>> > Chamikara Jayalath commented on BEAM-3357:
>> > ------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > You mean we could bump up the upper bound ? I think we should keep some
>> > upper bound in case we get badly broken by a future protobuf release.
>> >
>> >> Python SDK head fails to run tests due to
>> >> Requirement.parse('protobuf<=3.4.0,>=3.2.0')
>> >>
>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>                 Key: BEAM-3357
>> >>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3357
>> >>             Project: Beam
>> >>          Issue Type: Bug
>> >>          Components: sdk-py-core
>> >>            Reporter: Chamikara Jayalath
>> >>            Priority: Critical
>> >>
>> >> Error is:
>> >> running build_ext
>> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >>   File "setup.py", line 202, in <module>
>> >>     'test': generate_protos_first(test),
>> >>   File
>> >> "/Users/chamikara/testing/test_py_12_14_2017_2/env_proto_3.4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/__init__.py",
>> >> line 129, in setup
>> >>     return distutils.core.setup(**attrs)
>> >>   File
>> >> "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/distutils/core.py",
>> >> line 151, in setup
>> >>     dist.run_commands()
>> >>   File
>> >> "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py",
>> >> line 953, in run_commands
>> >>     self.run_command(cmd)
>> >>   File
>> >> "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py",
>> >> line 972, in run_command
>> >>     cmd_obj.run()
>> >>   File "setup.py", line 142, in run
>> >>     super(cmd, self).run()
>> >>   File
>> >> "/Users/chamikara/testing/test_py_12_14_2017_2/env_proto_3.4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/test.py",
>> >> line 225, in run
>> >>     with self.project_on_sys_path():
>> >>   File
>> >> "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/contextlib.py",
>> >> line 17, in __enter__
>> >>     return self.gen.next()
>> >>   File
>> >> "/Users/chamikara/testing/test_py_12_14_2017_2/env_proto_3.4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/test.py",
>> >> line 164, in project_on_sys_path
>> >>     require('%s==%s' % (ei_cmd.egg_name, ei_cmd.egg_version))
>> >>   File
>> >> "/Users/chamikara/testing/test_py_12_14_2017_2/env_proto_3.4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
>> >> line 984, in require
>> >>     needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements))
>> >>   File
>> >> "/Users/chamikara/testing/test_py_12_14_2017_2/env_proto_3.4/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
>> >> line 875, in resolve
>> >>     raise VersionConflict(dist, req).with_context(dependent_req)
>> >> pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (protobuf 3.5.0.post1
>> >> (/Users/chamikara/testing/test_py_12_14_2017_2/beam/sdks/python/.eggs/protobuf-3.5.0.post1-py2.7.egg),
>> >> Requirement.parse('protobuf<=3.4.0,>=3.2.0'), set(['apache-beam']))
>> >> Seems like grpcio did a release today which is breaking us:
>> >> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/grpcio/1.8.1
>> >> We have to either bump our protobuf dependency or reduce the upper
>> >> bound of grpcio dependency to previous release (1.7.3).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> > (v6.4.14#64029)
>
>

Reply via email to