Yea, what you call overview/list style page is what I want to add. Just a
few, and focused on modules that have an interesting long-term trajectory,
like SDKs, DSLs, runners, or meaningful collections of connectors. I want
it to be reasonably consumable by users as well as contributors. To me that
implies having it well-integrated into the web site for UX reasons.

Confluence or wiki has now been mentioned a few times on threads and in
person too. I'm going to fork a (supportive) thread more generally about
that.

Just to unwrap BIP: How would it differ from (a) JIRA ticket and (b) a
proposal gdoc. Just for history, when Beam started, the (much smaller, and
now very different) community chose JIRA instead of BIP. How would it
relate to (c) the overview/list style page and (d) the quarterly brainstorm.

Kenn

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 7:28 AM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:

> I like the idea of presenting strategic and user impacting initiatives
> (ongoing and future) in an easy to consume format, but also think that
> "roadmap" sounds a bit too corporate...
>
> Other projects, including Flink, Kafka and Spark have the concept of
> "Improvement Proposal" that could serve this purpose, so maybe it is time
> for "BIP"?
>
> There could then be an overview/list style page that shows in-progress and
> proposed items that gives the visitor an idea where the project is headed.
>
> Also, can we consider confluence for this? It is ASF hosted but easier to
> maintain than beam-site.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> OK, I have one note: what about longer-term "roadmap", in quotes because
>> that just means it is "ideas for the future". Like the Spark runner could
>> have a written roadmap that includes lots of TODOs that extend far into the
>> future. It gives a menu of things to think about when filling this out each
>> quarter. Users and contributors could potentially comment / upvote.
>>
>> I think this is probably a separate thing than what you have here - it
>> could just be a public gdoc with no particular structure, or JIRA tags
>> bundled into some kind of report - but what do you think?
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:37 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is great. I'm really excited to build a community process for this.
>>>
>>> Kenn
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:05 PM Griselda Cuevas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Beam Community,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to propose the creation of a Public Project Roadmap. Here are
>>>> the details as well as some artifacts I started already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------_____________-----------
>>>>
>>>> *Proposal *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *What?*
>>>>
>>>> Create a simple spreadsheet-based project roadmap to generate an
>>>> overview of all the efforts driven by different members of the community. I
>>>> propose doing something like this tracker I put together
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W6xvPmGyG8Nd9R7wkwgwRJvZdyLoBg6F3NCrPafbKmk/edit#gid=0>
>>>>  [1].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Why?*
>>>>
>>>> *The ultimate purpose of this roadmap is to create a tool and method to
>>>> make our project more transparent and efficient. It will help us map
>>>> dependencies, identify collaboration areas and communicate future releases
>>>> to users more clearly. *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *How?*
>>>>
>>>> We could update the current status of the roadmap every three months
>>>> (quarter), following these guidelines and timeline
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jzASbp_5GrZdsF5YXau-MPh_v0jW6egJwL_Pyac5zeE/edit#heading=h.6dyyhz5krl9v>
>>>>  [2].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> G
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1W6xvPmGyG8Nd9R7wkwgwRJvZdyLoBg6F3NCrPafbKmk/edit#gid=0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jzASbp_5GrZdsF5YXau-MPh_v0jW6egJwL_Pyac5zeE/edit#heading=h.6dyyhz5krl9v
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to