Any updates on BEAM-4512? On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> Thanks all, it seems as though only Google needs the grace period. I'll > wait for the shorter of BEAM-4512 or two weeks before merging > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5571 > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:29 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Definitely a good opportunity to decouple your build tools from your >> dependencies' build tools. >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 2:42 PM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 on this effort >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> >>> Date: 6/6/18 2:09 PM (GMT-08:00) >>> To: dev@beam.apache.org, u...@beam.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [BEAM-4126] Deleting Maven build files (pom.xml) >>> grace period? >>> >>> +1 for the overall effort. As Pablo mentioned, we need some time to >>> migrate internal Dataflow build off of Maven build files. I created >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4512 for this. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cham >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:30 PM Eugene Kirpichov <kirpic...@google.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Is it possible for Dataflow to just keep a copy of the pom.xmls and >>>> delete it as soon as Dataflow is migrated? >>>> >>>> Overall +1, I've been using Gradle without issues for a while and >>>> almost forgot pom.xml's still existed. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 1:13 PM Pablo Estrada <pabl...@google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I agree that we should delete the pom.xml files soon, as they create a >>>>> burden for maintainers. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to be able to extend the grace period by a bit, to allow the >>>>> internal build systems at Google to move away from using the Beam poms. >>>>> >>>>> We use these pom files to build Dataflow workers, and thus it's >>>>> critical for us that they are available for a few more weeks while we set >>>>> up a gradle build. Perhaps 4 weeks? >>>>> (Calling out+Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> who has >>>>> recently worked on internal Dataflow tooling.) >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> -P. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:05 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Note: Apache Beam will still provide pom.xml for each release it >>>>>> produces. This is only about people using Maven to build Apache Beam >>>>>> themselves and not relying on the released artifacts in Maven Central. >>>>>> >>>>>> With the first release using Gradle as the build system is underway, >>>>>> I wanted to start this thread to remind people that we are going to >>>>>> delete >>>>>> the Maven pom.xml files after the 2.5.0 release is finalized plus a two >>>>>> week grace period. >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there others who would like a shorter/longer grace period? >>>>>> >>>>>> The PR to delete the pom.xml is here: >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5571 >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback >>>>> <https://goto.google.com/pabloem-feedback> >>>>> >>>>