Thanks all for the votes and comments.

re:Jira - I hear and understand all questions about Jira not being the
absolute best option, however I think the positive points are strong enough
to still use is as primary option.

re: Taxonomy - The Project Management I refer to in #1 are more tasks like,
clean-up Stale Jira tickets or ensure releases are on time. Therefore I
would leave it as a separate option.

Thanks all for your valuable comments, I'll proceed to implement this.

G




On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 12:09, Hadar Hod <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:50 AM Henning Rohde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:44 AM Rose Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 Great idea
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:01 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1. Idea sounds great.
>>>>
>>>> --Mikhail
>>>>
>>>> Have feedback <http://go/migryz-feedback>?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 7:19 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 Code is just one part of a successful open-source project. As long
>>>>> as
>>>>> the tasks are properly labelled and actionable, I think it works to
>>>>> put
>>>>> them into JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24.08.18 15:09, Matthias Baetens wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I fully agree and think it is a great idea.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think that, next to visibility and keeping track of everything
>>>>> that is
>>>>> > going on in the community, the other goal would be documenting best
>>>>> > practices for future use.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I am also not sure, though, if JIRA is the best place to do so, as
>>>>> > Austin raised.
>>>>> > Introducing (yet) another tool on the other hand, might also not be
>>>>> > ideal. Has anyone else experience with this from other Apache
>>>>> projects?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 06:04 Austin Bennett <
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     Certainly tracking and managing these are important -- though, is
>>>>> >     Jira the best tool for these things?
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     I do see it useful to put in Jira tickets in for my director to
>>>>> have
>>>>> >     conversations on specific topics with people, for consensus
>>>>> >     building, etc etc.  So, I have seen it work even for non-coding
>>>>> tasks.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     It seems like much of #s 2-6 mentioned requires project
>>>>> management
>>>>> >     applied to those specific domains and is applicable elsewhere,
>>>>> >     wondering what constitutes "pure" project management in #1 (as it
>>>>> >     applies here)...?  In that light I'm just getting picky about
>>>>> >     taxonomy :-)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >     On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:10 PM Alan Myrvold <
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         I like the idea of recognizing non-code contributions. These
>>>>> >         other efforts have been very helpful.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >         On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:07 PM Griselda Cuevas <
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> >         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             Hi Beam Community,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             I'd like to start tracking non-code contributions for
>>>>> Beam,
>>>>> >             specially around these six categories:
>>>>> >             1) Project Management
>>>>> >             2) Community Management
>>>>> >             3) Advocacy
>>>>> >             4) Events & Meetups
>>>>> >             5) Documentation
>>>>> >             6) Training
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             The proposal would be to create six boards in Jira, one
>>>>> per
>>>>> >             proposed category, and as part of this initiative also
>>>>> clean
>>>>> >             the already existing "Project Management" component, i.e.
>>>>> >             making sure all issues there are still relevant.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             After this, I'd also create a landing page in the website
>>>>> >             that talks about all types of contributions to the
>>>>> project.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             The reason for doing this is mainly to give visibility to
>>>>> >             some of the great work our community does beyond code
>>>>> pushes
>>>>> >             in Github. Initiatives around Beam are starting to spark
>>>>> >             around the world, and it'd be great to become an Apache
>>>>> >             project recognized for our outstanding community
>>>>> recognition.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             What are your thoughts?
>>>>> >             G
>>>>> >
>>>>> >             Gris
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Max
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Rose Thi Nguyen
>>>
>>>   Technical Writer
>>>
>>> (281) 683-6900
>>>
>>

Reply via email to