+1

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 7:19 PM Griselda Cuevas <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks all for the votes and comments.
>
> re:Jira - I hear and understand all questions about Jira not being the
> absolute best option, however I think the positive points are strong enough
> to still use is as primary option.
>
> re: Taxonomy - The Project Management I refer to in #1 are more tasks
> like, clean-up Stale Jira tickets or ensure releases are on time. Therefore
> I would leave it as a separate option.
>
> Thanks all for your valuable comments, I'll proceed to implement this.
>
> G
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 12:09, Hadar Hod <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:50 AM Henning Rohde <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:44 AM Rose Nguyen <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 Great idea
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:01 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1. Idea sounds great.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Mikhail
>>>>>
>>>>> Have feedback <http://go/migryz-feedback>?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 7:19 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 Code is just one part of a successful open-source project. As long
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> the tasks are properly labelled and actionable, I think it works to
>>>>>> put
>>>>>> them into JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24.08.18 15:09, Matthias Baetens wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I fully agree and think it is a great idea.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I think that, next to visibility and keeping track of everything
>>>>>> that is
>>>>>> > going on in the community, the other goal would be documenting best
>>>>>> > practices for future use.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I am also not sure, though, if JIRA is the best place to do so, as
>>>>>> > Austin raised.
>>>>>> > Introducing (yet) another tool on the other hand, might also not be
>>>>>> > ideal. Has anyone else experience with this from other Apache
>>>>>> projects?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 06:04 Austin Bennett <
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     Certainly tracking and managing these are important -- though,
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> >     Jira the best tool for these things?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     I do see it useful to put in Jira tickets in for my director to
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> >     conversations on specific topics with people, for consensus
>>>>>> >     building, etc etc.  So, I have seen it work even for non-coding
>>>>>> tasks.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     It seems like much of #s 2-6 mentioned requires project
>>>>>> management
>>>>>> >     applied to those specific domains and is applicable elsewhere,
>>>>>> >     wondering what constitutes "pure" project management in #1 (as
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> >     applies here)...?  In that light I'm just getting picky about
>>>>>> >     taxonomy :-)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:10 PM Alan Myrvold <
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         I like the idea of recognizing non-code contributions. These
>>>>>> >         other efforts have been very helpful.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:07 PM Griselda Cuevas <
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             Hi Beam Community,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             I'd like to start tracking non-code contributions for
>>>>>> Beam,
>>>>>> >             specially around these six categories:
>>>>>> >             1) Project Management
>>>>>> >             2) Community Management
>>>>>> >             3) Advocacy
>>>>>> >             4) Events & Meetups
>>>>>> >             5) Documentation
>>>>>> >             6) Training
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             The proposal would be to create six boards in Jira, one
>>>>>> per
>>>>>> >             proposed category, and as part of this initiative also
>>>>>> clean
>>>>>> >             the already existing "Project Management" component,
>>>>>> i.e.
>>>>>> >             making sure all issues there are still relevant.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             After this, I'd also create a landing page in the
>>>>>> website
>>>>>> >             that talks about all types of contributions to the
>>>>>> project.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             The reason for doing this is mainly to give visibility
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> >             some of the great work our community does beyond code
>>>>>> pushes
>>>>>> >             in Github. Initiatives around Beam are starting to spark
>>>>>> >             around the world, and it'd be great to become an Apache
>>>>>> >             project recognized for our outstanding community
>>>>>> recognition.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             What are your thoughts?
>>>>>> >             G
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             Gris
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rose Thi Nguyen
>>>>
>>>>   Technical Writer
>>>>
>>>> (281) 683-6900
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to