I attempted to cut the 2.7.0 RC1 today, but encountered an issue where the
JVM consistently segfaulted at
the :beam-sdks-java-io-hadoop-input-format:test task.  I will investigate
further tomorrow.  Let me know if this anyone knows of this issue and has
any insight.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:21 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> It sounds good to me. I'm late on my PRs, but not release blocker
> anyway. I will wait the next release cycle ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 29/08/2018 21:18, Charles Chen wrote:
> > I have cut the release branch for 2.7.0, since there continue to be no
> > blockers listed in JIRA.  I will build the first release candidate soon.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:38 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com
> > <mailto:c...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hey everyone, I want to highlight again to those who missed it that
> >     if you are aware of any 2.7.0 release blockers, you should add it as
> >     a blocker in JIRA with a target version of 2.7.0.  It is very
> >     helpful to know this information in advance.  As of right now, there
> >     are no such blockers listed in JIRA, and I will be cutting the
> >     release branch on Wednesday 8/29.
> >
> >     Best,
> >     Charles
> >
> >     On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 2:38 PM Charles Chen <c...@google.com
> >     <mailto:c...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Thanks everyone.  Again, we will proceed with the initial
> >         release cut on August 29.
> >
> >         A reminder to please tag any blocking issues as "Priority:
> >         Blocker" and "Fix version: 2.7.0" in JIRA.  We recently
> >         resolved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-5180, and
> >         there are no other blocking bugs at the moment.
> >
> >         On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 8:19 PM Griselda Cuevas <g...@google.com
> >         <mailto:g...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >             +1 Thanks for volunteering and keeping us in schedule!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >             On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 11:58, Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com
> >             <mailto:eh...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                 +1
> >
> >                 On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:33 PM Boyuan Zhang
> >                 <boyu...@google.com <mailto:boyu...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                     +1
> >                     Thanks for volunteering, Charles!
> >
> >                     On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 3:22 PM Rafael Fernandez
> >                     <rfern...@google.com <mailto:rfern...@google.com>>
> >                     wrote:
> >
> >                         +1, thanks for volunteering, Charles!
> >
> >                         On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:09 PM Charles Chen
> >                         <c...@google.com <mailto:c...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                             Thank you Andrew for pointing out my
> >                             mistake.  We should follow the calendar and
> >                             aim to cut on 8/29, not 9/7 as I incorrectly
> >                             wrote earlier.
> >
> >                             On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:02 PM Andrew
> >                             Pilloud <apill...@google.com
> >                             <mailto:apill...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                                 +1 Thanks for volunteering! The calendar
> >                                 I have puts the cut date at August 29th,
> >                                 which looks to be 6 weeks from when
> >                                 2.6.0 was cut. Do I have the wrong
> calendar?
> >
> >                                 See:
> >
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America%2FLos_Angeles
> >
> >                                 Andrew
> >
> >                                 On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:43 AM Connell
> >                                 O'Callaghan <conne...@google.com
> >                                 <mailto:conne...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                                     +1 Charles thank you for taking this
> >                                     up and helping us maintain this
> >                                     schedule.
> >
> >                                     On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:29 AM
> >                                     Charles Chen <c...@google.com
> >                                     <mailto:c...@google.com>> wrote:
> >
> >                                         Hey everyone,
> >
> >                                         Our release calendar indicates
> >                                         that the process for the 2.7.0
> >                                         Beam release should start on
> >                                         September 7.
> >
> >                                         I volunteer to perform this
> >                                         release and propose the
> >                                         following schedule:
> >
> >                                           * We start triaging issues in
> >                                             JIRA this week.
> >                                           * I will cut the initial 2.7.0
> >                                             release branch on September
> 7.
> >                                           * After September 7, any
> >                                             blockers will need to be
> >                                             manually cherry-picked into
> >                                             the release branch.
> >                                           * After tests pass and
> >                                             blockers are fully
> >                                             addressed, I will move on
> >                                             and perform other release
> tasks.
> >
> >                                         What do you think?
> >
> >                                         Best,
> >                                         Charles
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to