+1 for using the term connectors. JB, thanks for agreeing to add content to this section.
- Cham On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:48 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote: > I like this idea and also the first option. I agree with making it clear > that things about IO are language specific. > > And +1 to calling it connectors or anything else that will resonate with > end users. > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Agree, I think connector is a more meaning name for users. >> >> IO is more the Beam "internal" wording. >> >> I will update this section as I have new connectors ( :) ) on the fly. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 26/10/2018 04:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote: >> > My $0.02 >> > >> > "IO" has an established meaning in Beam dev argot but I think on the web >> > page I would use the word "connector" or something more universal. >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM Chamikara Jayalath < >> [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > (1) Add a top level IO roadmap. >> > >> > >> > I like this, but it is important on the roadmap to be very clear about >> > language / SDK. >> > >> > >> > (2) Add IO roadmap sub-sections under each SDK instead of at top >> level. >> > >> > >> > This seems OK to me too. If you are a user and you have some data you >> > just want to see if it is going to be accessible to you soon. You >> > probably already committed to a language. >> > >> > >> > (3) We don't need a IO roadmap since we already have >> > https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/ >> > >> > >> > I think the roadmap / in-progress part should move to the new Roadmap >> > and/or the wiki. >> > >> > Kenn >> > >> > >> > >> > WDYT ? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Cham >> > >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> > From: *Chamikara Jayalath* <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > Date: Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:07 PM >> > Subject: Re: [apache/beam] [Website] Add roadmap at top level >> (#6718) >> > To: apache/beam <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > Cc: Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>>, Your activity >> > <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> >> > >> > >> > Ok. Makes sense. Kenn and others, WDYT ? We can start writing down a >> > roadmap for IO if there's no objection. It can include more details >> > about some of the proposed IO mentioned in >> > https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/ as well as >> > information on upcoming major IO related efforts such as >> > cross-language IO support and SDF (in addition to what will be >> > available in portability roadmap for these features). >> > >> > — >> > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. >> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> > <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6718#issuecomment-433262537>, >> > or mute the thread >> > < >> https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKUZEUcsbL6bhjOfeRiNZmqtab3PDWBjks5uom5KgaJpZM4Xj9s1 >> >. >> > >> > >
