I have been relying on the Intellij's ability to decompile the class files, its not as good as the original source for sure.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 3:26 AM Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > We decided not to publish source files for now. The main reason are > possible legal issues with publishing relocated source code. > > On 16.11.18 05:24, Thomas Weise wrote: > > Thanks for driving this. Did we reach a conclusion regarding publishing > > relocated source artifacts? Debugging would be painful without (unless > > manually installed in the local repo). > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:05 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com > > <mailto:lc...@google.com>> wrote: > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the vendored > > artifacts gRPC 1.13.1 and Guava 20.0: > > [ ] +1, Approve the release > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > The creation of these artifacts are the outcome of the discussion > > about vendoring[1]. > > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which > includes: > > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2], > > * commit hash "3678d403fcfea6a3994d7b86cfe6db70039087b0" [3], > > * Java artifacts were built with Gradle 4.10.2 and OpenJDK 1.8.0_161 > > * artifacts which are signed with the key with fingerprint > > EAD5DE293F4A03DD2E77565589E68A56E371CCA2 [4] > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by > > majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. > > > > Thanks, > > Luke > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4c12db35b40a6d56e170cd6fc8bb0ac4c43a99aa3cb7dbae54176815@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > > [2] > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1052 > > [3] > > > https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/3678d403fcfea6a3994d7b86cfe6db70039087b0 > > [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > > >
