Putting the tags in the subject line is inline with the style of what we currently do using [DISCUSS], [VOTE], [BEAM-YYY] so I like that. (I forgot that you can edit subject after the fact, thanks for pointing that out.)
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:04 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote: > The traditional thing to do is something like [SQL] or [Portability] in > the subject. Cannot be added after the email has been sent, but your email > client can probably do that part, right? If another user changes the > subject line to add more tags in their reply, I think things like gmail > will actually keep the thread intact and it will show up in searches too. > Lots of lightweight options that don't require us to invent anything. > > Kenn > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 AM Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Kafka uses KIPs >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals >> >> Flink uses FLIPs >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals >> >> So Beam - BIPs ???? >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:48 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> dev@beam.apache.org gets a lot of e-mail. I was wondering how other >>> Apache projects help their contributors focus on design/project discussions >>> (such as SQL, SplittableDoFn, Portability, Samza, Flink, Testing, ...)? >>> >>> I'm looking for a solution that allows people to tag a discussion with >>> multiple topics, and that tags can be added after the e-mail has been sent >>> as the discussion may cross multiple topics such as testing and SQL. >>> >>> I was initially thinking that we could embed tags like "topic:sql" in >>> the message body and if something was part of multiple tags it would be >>> "topic:sql topic:testing" to make it easy >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>
