I also think confluence makes the most sense. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 11:57 AM Alexey Romanenko <aromanenko....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Cyrus that Confluence page should a good place for that > since, seems, it will be very dev oriented documentation. > > > On 7 Aug 2019, at 16:31, Cyrus Maden <cma...@google.com> wrote: > > Hi Łukasz, > > This sounds perfect for the confluence, since we already have the testing > guide > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BEAM/Contribution+Testing+Guide> > in there. There's already a link to the testing guide in the > beam.apache.org/contribute section, which might help direct folks to the > new doc as well. > > Best, > Cyrus > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 7:54 AM Łukasz Gajowy <lgaj...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm currently working on documenting the load tests of Core Apache Beam >> operations >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PuIQv4v06eosKKwT76u7S6IP88AnXhTf870Rcj1AHt4/edit#> >> as we have some Jenkins jobs running and several dashboards for that. >> >> This is what I've got so far (work in progress but comments are welcome): >> LINK >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t41vGO7uWdeV0P-v8dTlKUSwshpuZHn0_rvjo-MPcs4/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> I've got the following doubts on where I should put it: >> >> - the tests are rather dev-facing. Should the documentation for them >> be on the beam.apache.org page (where the user-facing documentation >> is located) or maybe only on Beam's confluence? >> - if that belongs to confluence only, should I simply place it under >> "technical/design docs" section? >> - if this goes on the website, what is the best place to put it? >> >> What are your thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> Łukasz >> > >
