Thanks Thomas, changed the doc to view only and granted you and Ahmet edit
access.
@all - please send requests for access with your google accounts. I will
update the thread once I document the process and submit the PR to the
website.

Thank you,
Aizhamal

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:12 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:

> I was able to subscribe now.
>
> Reminder for others that the spreadsheet of interest can be found here:
> s.apache.org/beam-tweets
>
> Aizhamal,
>
> Can you help with a couple changes to bring this closer to how similar
> gdoc resources are handled?
>
> * Make the document view only. *PMC members* that care to help with this
> can request edit access.
> * Document the process for other contributors. Maybe here?
> https://beam.apache.org/contribute/
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:39 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I am able to subscribe to notifications now. Thomas does it work for you?
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:23 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I set the access to 'anyone can edit'. Let me know if notifications work
>>> now.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:00 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> You are probably right and it is an access issue.
>>>>
>>>> Aizhamal, could you give us edit access? And we can see if
>>>> notifications work after that.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:41 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The use of JIRA was also suggested before, but why do the
>>>>> notifications not work? I wasn't able to subscribe and I suspect that was
>>>>> due to not having sufficient access to the spreadsheet?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:26 PM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As far as I understand we have not resolved this discussion and the
>>>>>> sticking issue is that there is no good way of subscribing to changes 
>>>>>> (i.e.
>>>>>> proposals for tweets) for interested parties. The method suggested in 
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> thread (e.g. Tools and then Notification rules.) does not work for some
>>>>>> reason for a few of us including myself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could we try to use any of our existing tools? For example, could the
>>>>>> proposals be done in the form of filing a new JIRA issue under a specific
>>>>>> component. All of us should be able to get notifications for that. And 
>>>>>> then
>>>>>> we can follow the lazy consensus and alternative approval options as
>>>>>> written down by Robert (1 week or 3 PMC +1s).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahmet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 3:47 AM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 1:02 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > From what I understand, spreadsheets (not docs) provide the
>>>>>>> functionality that we need:
>>>>>>> https://support.google.com/docs/answer/91588
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Interested PMC members can subscribe and react to changes in the
>>>>>>> spreadsheet.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Lazy consensus requires a minimum wait. How much should that be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 72 hours is a pretty typical minimum, but I'd go a bit longer. A
>>>>>>> week?
>>>>>>> I'd want at least two pairs of eyes though, so if it's a PMC member
>>>>>>> that proposes the message someone else on the PMC should approve
>>>>>>> before it goes out on an official channel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Should there be an alternative approval option (like minimum
>>>>>>> number of +1s) for immediate post (in case it is time sensitive)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1. I'd say three is probably sufficient, five at most.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For both of these, let's just do something conservative and see how
>>>>>>> it goes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 7:28 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> GDocs also have the ability to subscribe to all comments so that
>>>>>>> works as well.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> This does add another system to our infrastructure, versus using
>>>>>>> Jira. But I think a spreadsheet for tracking what has been sent and 
>>>>>>> when,
>>>>>>> it could be helpful to have the added structure.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Kenn
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 10:05 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Here is an idea how this could be done: Create a JIRA ticket
>>>>>>> that will always remain open. Have folks append their suggested tweets 
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>> comments. Interested PMC members can watch that ticket.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> Thomas
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 10:41 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> Pinging individual PMC members doesn't work. There needs to be
>>>>>>> visibility to proposed actions to anyone that is interested. That would
>>>>>>> require a form of subscribe/notification mechanism (as exists for PRs 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> JIRAs).
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 10:33 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>>>>>>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> With the spreadsheet in http://s.apache.org/beam-tweets,
>>>>>>> anyone can propose tweets. I will check it every few days, and ping/tag 
>>>>>>> PMC
>>>>>>> members to review tweets and publish. Does that sound fine?
>>>>>>> >>>>> If you have ideas on how to make the process better, please
>>>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >>>>> Aizhamal
>>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 4:10 AM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> What would be the mechanism to notify the PMC that there is
>>>>>>> something to review?
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:55 PM Kenneth Knowles <
>>>>>>> k...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bringing the PMC's conclusion back to this list, we are
>>>>>>> happy to start with the following arrangement:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>  - Doc/spreadsheet/etc readable by dev@ (aka the public),
>>>>>>> writable by some group of contributors to set up a queue of news
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>  - Any member of PMC approves and executes the posts, with
>>>>>>> enough time elapsing to consider it lazy consensus
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any mistake transcribing this conclusion is my own. And of
>>>>>>> course nothing is permanent, but we try and iterate.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:18 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>>>>>>> aizha...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have created a spreadsheet where people can suggest
>>>>>>> tweets [1]. It contains a couple of tweets that have been tweeted as
>>>>>>> examples. Also, there are a couple others that I will ask PMC members to
>>>>>>> review in the next few days.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have also created a blog post[2] to invite community
>>>>>>> members to participate by proposing tweets / retweets.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does this look OK to everyone? I’d love to try it out and
>>>>>>> see if it drives engagement in the community. If not we can always 
>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>> the processes.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> aizhamal
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] s.apache.org/beam-tweets
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8747
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:26 PM Kenneth Knowles <
>>>>>>> k...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for taking on this work!
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:52 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>>>>>>> aizha...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to pilot this if that's okay by everyone. I'll
>>>>>>> set up a spreadsheet, write a blog post publicizing it, and perhaps send
>>>>>>> out a tweet. We can improve the process later with tools if necessary.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks all and have a great weekend!
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Aizhamal
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:37 PM Kenneth Knowles <
>>>>>>> k...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Great idea.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Austin - point well taken about whether the PMC really
>>>>>>> has to micro-manage here. The stakes are potentially very high, but so 
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> the stakes for code and website changes.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I know that comdev votes authoring privileges to people
>>>>>>> who are not committers, but they are not speaking on behalf of comdev 
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> under their own name.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Let's definitely find a way to be effective on social
>>>>>>> media.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:14 AM Maximilian Michels <
>>>>>>> m...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aizhamal,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is a great idea. I think it would help Beam to be
>>>>>>> more prominent on
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> social media.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We need to discuss this also on the private@ mailing
>>>>>>> list but I don't
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> see anything standing in the way if the PMC always gets
>>>>>>> to approve the
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> proposed social media postings.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I could even imagine that the PMC gives rights to a
>>>>>>> Beam community
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> member to post in their name.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Max
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.05.19 03:09, Austin Bennett wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > Is PMC definitely in charge of this (approving,
>>>>>>> communication channel,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > etc)?
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > There could even be a more concrete pull-request-like
>>>>>>> function even for
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > things like tweets (to minimize cut/paste operations)?
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > I remember a bit of a mechanism having been proposed
>>>>>>> some time ago (in
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > another circumstance), though doesn't look like it
>>>>>>> made it terribly far:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> http://www.redhenlab.org/home/the-cognitive-core-research-topics-in-red-hen/the-barnyard/-slick-tweeting
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > (I haven't otherwise seen such functionality).
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 4:54 PM Robert Burke <
>>>>>>> rob...@frantil.com
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > <mailto:rob...@frantil.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >     +1
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >     As a twitter user, I like this idea.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >     On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 15:18, Aizhamal Nurmamat
>>>>>>> kyzy
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >     <aizha...@google.com <mailto:aizha...@google.com>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         Hello everyone,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         What does the community think of making
>>>>>>> Apache Beam’s social
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         media presence more active and more community
>>>>>>> driven?
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         The Slack and StackOverflow for Apache Beam
>>>>>>> offer pretty nice
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         support, but we still could utilize Twitter &
>>>>>>> LinkedIn better to
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         share more interesting Beam news. For
>>>>>>> example, we could tweet to
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         welcome new committers, announce new features
>>>>>>> consistently,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         share and recognize contributions, promote
>>>>>>> events and meetups,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         share other news that are relevant to Beam,
>>>>>>> big data, etc.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         I understand that PMC members may not have
>>>>>>> time to do curation,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         moderation and creation of content; so I was
>>>>>>> wondering if we
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         could create a spreadsheet where community
>>>>>>> members could propose
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         posts with publishing dates, and let somebody
>>>>>>> to filter,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         moderate, and manage it; then send to a PMC
>>>>>>> member for publication.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         I would love to help where I can in this
>>>>>>> regard. I’ve had some
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         experience doing social media elsewhere in
>>>>>>> the past.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         Best
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >         Aizhamal
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to