+1 I'm happy to whip together the Go SDK version once the encoding has been concretely decided.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, 6:07 PM Chad Dombrova <chad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It would still be a standard coder - the distinction I'm proposing is that >> there are certain coders that _must_ be implemented by a new runner/sdk >> (for example windowedvalue, varint, kv, ...) since they are important for >> SDK - runner communication, but now we're starting to standardize coders >> that are useful for cross-language and schemas. >> > > Got it. Sounds good. > > -chad > > >
