UPD:
All PRs are merged and tickets are closed. Building RC.

--Mikhail

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:10 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> Got release branch green except gradle build that timeout and fails with
> go tests that look like flake.
>
> I'll go over remaining PRs and Jiras today and do final tests validation.
> Will start RC process afterwards.
>
> --Mikhail
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:29 PM Jan Lukavský <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mikhail,
>> I created PR for [BEAM-8812]. It is linked in the JIRA.
>> Jan
>>
>> Dne 23. 11. 2019 0:45 napsal uživatel Mikhail Gryzykhin <
>> [email protected]>:
>>
>> UPD:
>> on current branch there's timeout on gradle build job, I'm mitigating it
>> by increasing job time. Seems that this job runs most of python tests. We
>> might look into adjusting the target.
>>
>> Second failure is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8812 . I
>> would really appreciate if someone can help me debug this one.
>>
>> --Mikhail
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:14 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I've poked through the bugs and there do seem to be a few that are
>> finished and a few that may not be started that should probably be deferred
>> if they can be triaged to not be blockers.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> There's still an outstanding cherry-pick PR that I can't merge due to
>> tests failing on it and release branch validation PR
>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9884>. Once I get tests green, I'll
>> send another update and review outstanding open issues.
>>
>> --Mikhail
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:40 AM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Any update regarding the release?
>>
>> The list still shows 10 open issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0%20and%20resolution%20is%20EMPTY
>>
>> Is the RC blocked on those?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:46 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:44 PM Gleb Kanterov <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like BigQueryIO DIRECT_READ is broken since 2.16.0, I've added a
>> ticket describing the problem and possible fix, see BEAM-8504
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8504> [1].
>>
>>
>> Should this be added to 2.16 blog post as a known issue?
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8504
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:19 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I opened https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9862 to raise the
>> documentation of Fix Version to the top level. It also includes the write
>> up of Jira priorities, to make clear that "Blocker" priority does not refer
>> to release blocking.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:16 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I've gone over the tickets and removed Fix Version from many of them that
>> do not seem to be critical defects. If I removed Fix Version from a ticket
>> you care about, please feel free to add it back. I am not trying to decide
>> what is in/out of the release, just trying to triage the Jira data to match
>> expected practices.
>>
>> It should probably be documented somewhere outside of the release guide.
>> As far as I can tell, the fact that we triage them down to zero is the only
>> place we mention that it is used to indicate release blockers and not used
>> for feature targets.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:40 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Wow, 28 release blocking tickets! That is the most I've ever seen, by
>> far. Many appear to be feature requests, not release-blocking defects. I
>> believe this is not according to our normal best practice. The release
>> cadence should not wait for features in progress, with exceptions discussed
>> on dev@. As a matter of best practice, I think we should triage feature
>> requests to not have Fix Version set until it has been discussed on dev@.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:55 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Beam 2.17 release branch cut is scheduled today (2019/10/23) according to
>> the release calendar [1].  I'll start working on the branch cutoff and
>> later work on cherry picking blocker fixes.
>>
>> If you have release blocking issues for 2.17 please mark their "Fix
>> Version" as 2.17.0 [2]. This tag is already created in JIRA in case you
>> would like to move any non-blocking issues to that version.
>>
>> There is a decent amount of open bugs to be resolved in 2.17.0 [2] and
>> only 4 [3] are marked as blockers. Please, review those if these bugs are
>> actually to be resolved in 2.17.0 and prioritize fixes if possible.
>>
>> Any thoughts, comments, objections?
>>
>> Regards.
>> Mikhail.
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com
>> [2]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0>
>> [3]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22%29%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to