Thank you for update Ismael.

Meanwhile:
I've built RC1 binaries, so it should be possible to test.

I'll wait for cherry pick from Ismael and once its in, start RC2.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 7:40 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mikhail it seems the SQL module generated pom is broken in 2.17.0. We will
> probably need to create a new RC.
> For context https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8858
> and still to confirm https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8917
> Cherry pick PRs coming soon.
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 7:04 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> UPD:
>> All PRs are merged and tickets are closed. Building RC.
>>
>> --Mikhail
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:10 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> Got release branch green except gradle build that timeout and fails with
>>> go tests that look like flake.
>>>
>>> I'll go over remaining PRs and Jiras today and do final tests
>>> validation. Will start RC process afterwards.
>>>
>>> --Mikhail
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:29 PM Jan Lukavský <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Mikhail,
>>>> I created PR for [BEAM-8812]. It is linked in the JIRA.
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>> Dne 23. 11. 2019 0:45 napsal uživatel Mikhail Gryzykhin <
>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> UPD:
>>>> on current branch there's timeout on gradle build job, I'm mitigating
>>>> it by increasing job time. Seems that this job runs most of python tests.
>>>> We might look into adjusting the target.
>>>>
>>>> Second failure is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8812 . I
>>>> would really appreciate if someone can help me debug this one.
>>>>
>>>> --Mikhail
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:14 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've poked through the bugs and there do seem to be a few that are
>>>> finished and a few that may not be started that should probably be deferred
>>>> if they can be triaged to not be blockers.
>>>>
>>>> Kenn
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> There's still an outstanding cherry-pick PR that I can't merge due to
>>>> tests failing on it and release branch validation PR
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9884>. Once I get tests green,
>>>> I'll send another update and review outstanding open issues.
>>>>
>>>> --Mikhail
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:40 AM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Any update regarding the release?
>>>>
>>>> The list still shows 10 open issues:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0%20and%20resolution%20is%20EMPTY
>>>>
>>>> Is the RC blocked on those?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:46 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 12:44 PM Gleb Kanterov <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It looks like BigQueryIO DIRECT_READ is broken since 2.16.0, I've added
>>>> a ticket describing the problem and possible fix, see BEAM-8504
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8504> [1].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should this be added to 2.16 blog post as a known issue?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8504
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:19 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I opened https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9862 to raise the
>>>> documentation of Fix Version to the top level. It also includes the write
>>>> up of Jira priorities, to make clear that "Blocker" priority does not refer
>>>> to release blocking.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:16 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've gone over the tickets and removed Fix Version from many of them
>>>> that do not seem to be critical defects. If I removed Fix Version from a
>>>> ticket you care about, please feel free to add it back. I am not trying to
>>>> decide what is in/out of the release, just trying to triage the Jira data
>>>> to match expected practices.
>>>>
>>>> It should probably be documented somewhere outside of the release
>>>> guide. As far as I can tell, the fact that we triage them down to zero is
>>>> the only place we mention that it is used to indicate release blockers and
>>>> not used for feature targets.
>>>>
>>>> Kenn
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:40 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Wow, 28 release blocking tickets! That is the most I've ever seen, by
>>>> far. Many appear to be feature requests, not release-blocking defects. I
>>>> believe this is not according to our normal best practice. The release
>>>> cadence should not wait for features in progress, with exceptions discussed
>>>> on dev@. As a matter of best practice, I think we should triage
>>>> feature requests to not have Fix Version set until it has been discussed on
>>>> dev@.
>>>>
>>>> Kenn
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:55 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Beam 2.17 release branch cut is scheduled today (2019/10/23) according
>>>> to the release calendar [1].  I'll start working on the branch cutoff and
>>>> later work on cherry picking blocker fixes.
>>>>
>>>> If you have release blocking issues for 2.17 please mark their "Fix
>>>> Version" as 2.17.0 [2]. This tag is already created in JIRA in case you
>>>> would like to move any non-blocking issues to that version.
>>>>
>>>> There is a decent amount of open bugs to be resolved in 2.17.0 [2] and
>>>> only 4 [3] are marked as blockers. Please, review those if these bugs are
>>>> actually to be resolved in 2.17.0 and prioritize fixes if possible.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts, comments, objections?
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>> Mikhail.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22%29%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0>
>>>> [3]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20(Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8457?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20status%20in%20%28Reopened%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Under%20Discussion%22%2C%20%22In%20Implementation%22%2C%20%22Triage%20Needed%22%29%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.17.0>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to