Yes, please update KEYS to have the correct key. (If you've never used the
other one you could just remove it.)

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 6:46 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see. Seems that the wrong key is imported into KEYS file. And header is
> incorrect.
>
> --Mikhail
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:16 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> I redownloaded binaries from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.17.0/ and ran
>>
>> gpg --verify apache-beam-2.17.0-source-release.zip.asc
>> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-beam-2.17.0-source-release.zip'
>> gpg: Signature made Mon 16 Dec 2019 09:17:23 PM PST
>> gpg:                using RSA key 53F72D4EEEF306D97736FE1065ABB07A8965E788
>> gpg: Good signature from "Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>"
>> [ultimate]
>>
>> Signature is valid with key 53F72D4EEEF306D97736FE1065ABB07A8965E788. The
>> key you received is different. Which binaries did you get that signature
>> from?
>>
>> --Mikhail
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:53 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (Other than that everything looks fine.)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:44 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > -1
>>> >
>>> > I'm having trouble verifying the signatures on the release artifacts.
>>> > When I try to import the key from
>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS I get
>>> >
>>> > pub   rsa4096 2019-10-22 [SC]
>>> >       79552F5C2FD869A08E097F96841855FB73AFFC7F
>>> > uid           [ unknown] Mikhail Gryzykhin (mikhail) <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > sub   rsa4096 2019-10-22 [E]
>>> >
>>> > which is not the key that these artifacts were signed with.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:23 PM Reuven Lax <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > +1
>>> > >
>>> > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:02 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +1. Validated Batch and Streaming quickstarts on Python 3.7 (using
>>> wheels) and Batch Mobile Gaming examples (user score, hourly team score) on
>>> Dataflow.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:23 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> This vote needs at least one more PMC vote before it can be
>>> finalized. Could you please validate and vote?
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 9:44 AM Luke Cwik <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> +1, I validated the Java quickstarts for the runners and the
>>> issues I have brought up have been moved to a future release.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:09 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> +1, I validated the python2 quick starts using wheels. Thank you
>>> for pushing the release this far.
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 1:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> I verified the Java quickstart on Dataflow manually.
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> Kenn
>>> > >>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:58 PM jincheng sun <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for drive this release Mikhail !
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> I have found there is an incorrect release version for release
>>> notes in PR[1], also left a question in PR[2].
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> But I do not think it's the blocker of the release :)
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Best,
>>> > >>>>>>> Jincheng
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10401
>>> > >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10402
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>> Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> 于2019年12月19日周四 上午3:31写道:
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> I validated python quickstarts with python 2. Wheels file are
>>> missing but they work otherwise. Once the wheel files are added I will add
>>> my vote.
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:00 AM Luke Cwik <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> I verified the release and ran the quickstarts and found
>>> that release 2.16 broke Apache Nemo runner which is also an issue for
>>> 2.17.0 RC #2. It is caused by a backwards incompatible change in
>>> ParDo.MultiOutput where getSideInputs return value was changed from List to
>>> Map as part of https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9275. I filed
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989 to track the issue.
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> Should we re-add the method back in 2.17.0 renaming the
>>> newly added method to something else and also patch 2.16.0 with a minor
>>> change including the same fix (breaking 2.16.0 users who picked up the new
>>> method) or leave as is?
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> I suggest not fixing this for 2.17, because the issue already
>>> exists in 2.16 and there are two releases in parallel and it would be fine
>>> to fix this for 2.18 or 2.19.
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>> +Reuven Lax, who merged the mentioned PR.
>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:13 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
>>> version 2.17.0, as follows:
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> comments)
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>>> which includes:
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>> 53F72D4EEEF306D97736FE1065ABB07A8965E788
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>  [3],
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>> Repository [4],
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.17.0-RC2" [5],
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing
>>> the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>>> release to the dist.apache.org [2].
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.17.0 release to help
>>> with validation [9].
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
>>> by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> --Mikhail
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345970&projectId=12319527
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.17.0/
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1087/
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.17.0-RC2
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10401
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/594
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10402
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [9]
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=803858785
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/u/apachebeam
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to