KEYS files should be fixed now.

On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:29 AM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, please update KEYS to have the correct key. (If you've never used the
> other one you could just remove it.)
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 6:46 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I see. Seems that the wrong key is imported into KEYS file. And header is
>> incorrect.
>>
>> --Mikhail
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 6:16 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>> I redownloaded binaries from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.17.0/ and ran
>>>
>>> gpg --verify apache-beam-2.17.0-source-release.zip.asc
>>> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-beam-2.17.0-source-release.zip'
>>> gpg: Signature made Mon 16 Dec 2019 09:17:23 PM PST
>>> gpg:                using RSA key
>>> 53F72D4EEEF306D97736FE1065ABB07A8965E788
>>> gpg: Good signature from "Mikhail Gryzykhin <[email protected]>"
>>> [ultimate]
>>>
>>> Signature is valid with key 53F72D4EEEF306D97736FE1065ABB07A8965E788.
>>> The key you received is different. Which binaries did you get that
>>> signature from?
>>>
>>> --Mikhail
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:53 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> (Other than that everything looks fine.)
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:44 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > -1
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm having trouble verifying the signatures on the release artifacts.
>>>> > When I try to import the key from
>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS I get
>>>> >
>>>> > pub   rsa4096 2019-10-22 [SC]
>>>> >       79552F5C2FD869A08E097F96841855FB73AFFC7F
>>>> > uid           [ unknown] Mikhail Gryzykhin (mikhail) <
>>>> [email protected]>
>>>> > sub   rsa4096 2019-10-22 [E]
>>>> >
>>>> > which is not the key that these artifacts were signed with.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:23 PM Reuven Lax <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > +1
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:02 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> +1. Validated Batch and Streaming quickstarts on Python 3.7 (using
>>>> wheels) and Batch Mobile Gaming examples (user score, hourly team score) on
>>>> Dataflow.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:23 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> This vote needs at least one more PMC vote before it can be
>>>> finalized. Could you please validate and vote?
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 9:44 AM Luke Cwik <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> +1, I validated the Java quickstarts for the runners and the
>>>> issues I have brought up have been moved to a future release.
>>>> > >>>>
>>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:09 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> +1, I validated the python2 quick starts using wheels. Thank
>>>> you for pushing the release this far.
>>>> > >>>>>
>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 1:27 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> I verified the Java quickstart on Dataflow manually.
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> Kenn
>>>> > >>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:58 PM jincheng sun <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks for drive this release Mikhail !
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> I have found there is an incorrect release version for
>>>> release notes in PR[1], also left a question in PR[2].
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> But I do not think it's the blocker of the release :)
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> Best,
>>>> > >>>>>>> Jincheng
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10401
>>>> > >>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10402
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>> Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> 于2019年12月19日周四 上午3:31写道:
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> I validated python quickstarts with python 2. Wheels file
>>>> are missing but they work otherwise. Once the wheel files are added I will
>>>> add my vote.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:00 AM Luke Cwik <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I verified the release and ran the quickstarts and found
>>>> that release 2.16 broke Apache Nemo runner which is also an issue for
>>>> 2.17.0 RC #2. It is caused by a backwards incompatible change in
>>>> ParDo.MultiOutput where getSideInputs return value was changed from List to
>>>> Map as part of https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9275. I filed
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989 to track the issue.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Should we re-add the method back in 2.17.0 renaming the
>>>> newly added method to something else and also patch 2.16.0 with a minor
>>>> change including the same fix (breaking 2.16.0 users who picked up the new
>>>> method) or leave as is?
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> I suggest not fixing this for 2.17, because the issue
>>>> already exists in 2.16 and there are two releases in parallel and it would
>>>> be fine to fix this for 2.18 or 2.19.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>> +Reuven Lax, who merged the mentioned PR.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:13 PM Mikhail Gryzykhin <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the
>>>> version 2.17.0, as follows:
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>>>> specific comments)
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review,
>>>> which includes:
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>> 53F72D4EEEF306D97736FE1065ABB07A8965E788
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>  [3],
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>> Repository [4],
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "v2.17.0-RC2" [5],
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing
>>>> the API reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>>>> release to the dist.apache.org [2].
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.17.0 release to help
>>>> with validation [9].
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * Docker images published to Docker Hub [10].
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
>>>> by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> --Mikhail
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345970&projectId=12319527
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.17.0/
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1087/
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.17.0-RC2
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10401
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/594
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [8] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10402
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [9]
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=803858785
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [10] https://hub.docker.com/u/apachebeam
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to