+1 On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 8:31 PM Luke Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 7:20 PM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Best, >> Jincheng >> >> >> Kai Jiang <jiang...@gmail.com> 于2020年2月23日周日 上午2:26写道： >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 09:50 Alex Van Boxel <a...@vanboxel.be> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> _/ >>>> >>>> _/ Alex Van Boxel >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 5:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> Le sam. 22 f?vr. 2020 ? 15:02, Isma?l Mej?a <ieme...@gmail.com> a >>>>> ?crit : >>>>> >>>>>> The version of bytebuddy Beam is vendoring (1.9.3) is more than 16 >>>>>> months old. I >>>>>> would like to propose that we upgrade it [1] to the most recent >>>>>> version (1.10.8) >>>>>> [2] so we can benefit of the latest improvements for Java 11 and >>>>>> upgraded ASM. >>>>>> >>>>>> If everyone agrees I would like to volunteer as the release manager >>>>>> for this >>>>>> upgrade. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9342 >>>>>> [2] https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/blob/master/release-notes.md >>>>>> >>>>>>
