It seems we have a clear consensus so I will proceed with the vote. Thanks!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:19 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 thanks! > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:13 PM Pablo Estrada <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 8:31 PM Luke Cwik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 7:20 PM jincheng sun <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Jincheng >>>> >>>> >>>> Kai Jiang <[email protected]> 于2020年2月23日周日 上午2:26写道： >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 09:50 Alex Van Boxel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> _/ >>>>>> >>>>>> _/ Alex Van Boxel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 5:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le sam. 22 f?vr. 2020 ? 15:02, Isma?l Mej?a <[email protected]> a >>>>>>> ?crit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The version of bytebuddy Beam is vendoring (1.9.3) is more than 16 >>>>>>>> months old. I >>>>>>>> would like to propose that we upgrade it [1] to the most recent >>>>>>>> version (1.10.8) >>>>>>>> [2] so we can benefit of the latest improvements for Java 11 and >>>>>>>> upgraded ASM. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If everyone agrees I would like to volunteer as the release manager >>>>>>>> for this >>>>>>>> upgrade. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9342 >>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/blob/master/release-notes.md >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
