Just mentioning that we have discovered
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9566 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9573 which are blockers for
the release. I'm currently fixing those. PR will be out later today.

-Max

On 28.02.20 20:11, Rui Wang wrote:
> Release branch 2.20.0 is already cut. 
> 
> Currently there should be only one blocking
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9288
> 
> But there is a newly added
> Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9322
> 
> 
> I will coordinate on those two Jira.
> 
> 
> 
> -Rui
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:18 PM Rui Wang <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi community,
> 
>     Just fyi:
> 
>     The 2.20.0 release branch should be cut yesterday (02/26) per
>     schedule. However as our python precommit was broken so I didn't cut
>     the branch.
> 
>     I am closely working with PR [1] owner to fix the python precommit.
>     Once the fix is in, I will cut the release branch immediately.
> 
> 
>     [1]: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10982
> 
> 
>     -Rui
> 
>     On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:06 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>         Not yet, up to last check nobody is tackling it, it is still
>         unassigned. Let's
>         not forget that the fix of this one requires an extra release of
>         the grpc
>         vendored dependency (the source of the issue).
> 
>         And yes this is a release blocker for the open source runners
>         because people
>         tend to package their projects with the respective runners in a
>         jar and this is
>         breaking at the moment.
> 
>         Kenn changed the priority of BEAM-9252 from Blocker to Critical
>         to follow the
>         conventions in [1], and from those definitions  'most critical
>         bugs should
>         block release'.
> 
>         [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/
> 
>         On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:42 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>             Curions, was there a resolution on BEAM-9252? Would it be a
>             release blocker?
> 
>             On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:42 AM Ismaël Mejía
>             <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>                 Thanks Rui for volunteering and for keeping the release
>                 pace!
> 
>                 Since we are discussing the next release, I would like
>                 to highlight that nobody
>                 apparently is working on this blocker issue:
> 
>                 BEAM-9252 Problem shading Beam pipeline with Beam
>                 2.20.0-SNAPSHOT
>                 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9252
> 
>                 This is a regression introduced by the move to vendored
>                 gRPC 1.26.0 and it
>                 probably will require an extra vendored gRPC release so
>                 better to give it
>                 some priority.
> 
> 
>                 On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Ahmet Altay
>                 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>                     +1. Thank you.
> 
>                     On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:01 PM Rui Wang
>                     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>                         Hi all,
> 
>                         The next (2.20.0) release branch cut is
>                         scheduled for 02/26, according to the calendar
>                         
> <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com>.
>                         I would like to volunteer myself to do this release.
>                         The plan is to cut the branch on that date,
>                         and cherrypick release-blocking fixes afterwards
>                         if any.
> 
>                         Any unresolved release blocking JIRA issues for
>                         2.20.0 should have their "Fix Version/s" marked
>                         as "2.20.0".
> 
>                         Any comments or objections? 
> 
> 
>                         -Rui
> 

Reply via email to